SOC Threat Intelligence Foundation Model
Security teams stitch endpoint, cloud, DNS, network, auth, and email signals across separate detectors. Each surface trains its own classifier on its own features and ships its own alert pipeline. This demo collapses ten of those signals into one shared model. A small cyber telemetry encoder turns 64 events x 15 normalized fields into 960 pseudo-tokens. The frozen LFM2.5-350M backbone processes the sequence with attention LoRA, and ten task heads predict in parallel: attack presence, risk score, current attacker stage, likely next tactic, next event type, response actions, identity compromise, lateral movement, exfil likelihood, and benign-admin confounder. Adding a new SOC signal is a head, not a model.
The Problem
SOC teams maintain separate detectors and classifiers per signal (verdict, risk, stage, forecast, response). Each is its own pipeline and refresh cadence. Cross-surface signals get lost because each model sees only its slice. A discovery + credential-access trajectory that predicts both 'lateral movement next' and 'identity compromise' is invisible to a model trained on either one.
How LFM Compares
Per-task gradient-boosted trees, rules, and point classifiers per SIEM lane. Each new business question (urgency, next tactic, exfil likelihood) is a new pipeline, a new model, and a new deployment.
What LFM Unlocks
One model where today there are five to ten. Verdict, risk, stage, next-tactic forecast, and reviewer signals share the same foundation, the same deployment, and the same audit trail. Adding a new SOC signal β next-technique, persistence risk, or a custom analyst label β is a new head, not a new model.
SOC Scenario
This demo is fine-tuned on sample data. Results improve with your data.